Moderator says, "Good evening and welcome to the IMPACT
Forum. Tonight we looking at the future of Hong Kong. Our first guest is Martin
Lee, head of the Democratic Party in Hong Kong. Then we'll be speaking Sandra
Burton, TIME's bureau chief in Hong Kong."
Moderator says, "If you want to ask a question, type "/go
auditorium" then click on the red question mark and submit your question in the
box. If you want to talk to other users while the interview continues, type, "/go
time.""
Moderator says, "Good evening, Mr. Lee and Ms. Burton."
Sandra_burton says, "Good evening."
Moderator says, "Mr. Lee, the government scaled back some of
its positions on Thursday. Where do things stand now?"
Martin_lee says, "The scaling back of our human rights
protection laws does not come from our present governor but from the future chief
executive designate Mr.Tung."
Martin_lee says, "Mr. Tung's justification is that there
must be a balance between the rights of individuals who want to demonstrate in public and the order of our society as a whole. but we already have that proper balance
under our present law and the police are happy with the present law and their
present powers."
Martin_lee says, "So why should Mr. Tung give the police
more powers than they want in restricting our people's right to demonstrate,
which they always do peacefully in Hong Kong."
Moderator presents question #151 from Eye_q_wizard: Do you think true
democracy is going to be allowed in HK and do you feel that your party could be
seriously threatened by the Chinese Government?
Martin_lee says, "True democracy is not to be equated only
with free and democratic elections. But without fair and democratic elections,
you don't even get started."
Martin_lee says, "In Hong Kong today, we already have a
legislature which was elected by more than one million people in September 1995
for a four year term. But the Chinese government has now
established another legislature, the members of which were selected by four
hundred Hong Kong people all of whom were hand-picked by Beijing."
Martin_lee says, "This Beijing chosen legislature will
replace our elected legislature on July 1 of this year. We can only expect the Beijing appointed
legislature to pass laws which Beijing wants and not laws which the Hong Kong
people want. And this appointed legislature is already
rolling back a number of human rights protection laws even before the first of
July."
Martin_lee says, "As for my party, the Democratic party,
which is the most popular political party in Hong Kong. It will be very tough for
us, once China takes Hong Kong back, because all our 19 legislators our of our
legislature of 60, will be thrown out of the legislature on July 1."
Martin_lee says, "To complete, the Beijing-controlled, new
legislature, will soon be changing our electoral laws to make sure that my party
can only win a very small number of seats in the future. "
Moderator says, "You've promised to carry the battle for
democracy forward. How will your party proceed when not part of the government?"
Martin_lee says, "It will indeed be very difficult once we
are thrown out of the legislature for we no longer have a forum within the
government. We will also be in great financial difficulties."
Martin_lee says, "On top of it all, we are afraid that the
press will be under a lot of pressure from Beijing and will therefore put us in a
very unfavorable light."
Martin_lee says, "But we will soldier on, confidently,
because we have the support of our people. We have been the voice of our people
and we intend to continue to be the voice of Hong Kong."
Moderator presents question #153 from Mgvalentin: Since we're here at
Time's web site, what problems do you think companies such as Time Inc. will face
once the new government is in place...?
Moderator says, "In other words do you think foreign
companies will be able to continue business unhindered"
Martin_lee says, "I certainly hope that the foreign press
will be given the same freedom which it has under British rule."
Martin_lee says, "But having seen how overseas journalists
are dealt with by the Chinese government in Beijing and elsewhere in China, I
have to say that there present worries are justified, but the best safeguard for
press freedom in Hong Kong under Chinese rule is for the press, both local and
overseas, to report as before, and when the freedom to report is curtailed in any
way, let all journalists shout about it.""
Moderator says, "If you are just joining us welcome to the
IMPACT forum on the Future of Hong Kong. We are speaking to opposition leader
Martin Lee, head of the Democratic Party and among those who will be replaced
when China takes over from Britain July 1. Also Joining us is TIME Hong Kong
Bureau chief Sandra Burton."
Moderator presents the speakers with question #154 from
Fortune_sysop: Why all the concern about democracy now? The economy worked fine
under the Brits, when there was little democracy for most of Hong Kong's history?
Martin_lee says, "Good question. It is true that under
British rule we have freedoms protected by the rule of law without democracy in
Hong Kong."
Martin_lee says, "But this is possible only because the
colonial government here is but an extension of the British administration 8,000
miles away, where both the British government and the British parliament are
democratically elected by the British people."
Martin_lee says, "If the British appointed governor were to
lock up overseas reporters without or I should say other people, without trial,
questions abound to be asked in the British parliament and it could theoretically
bring down the British government. Now if the Chinese government and its
legislature, the National People's Congress, were also democratically elected,
then I would be happy to leave our freedoms and our rule of law to be left in the
hands of the democratically elected Chinese government."
Martin_lee says, "But, unfortunately, the Chinese government
and the Chinese National People's Congress are not democratically elected at
all."
Martin_lee says, "Chinese people have long been put into
prison for their political or religious beliefs and no question has ever been
asked in the NPC about these infringements on individual freedoms."
Martin_lee says, "That is why once our links with Britain
are to be severed, we must look for some other safeguards which can only come
from democracy because it will guarantee that all our leaders, the chief
executive as well as our legislators,"
Martin_lee says, "will have to defend our freedoms, our else
they will not be re-elected in the next elections. Done"
Moderator presents question #160 from Fortune_sysop: Might China's
rule be better in terms of such matters as educational standards? Under the
laissez-faire of the British, Hong Kong schools have been turning out fewer good
English speakers than, say, Singapore. Doesn't Hong Kong need more intervention?
Martin_lee says, "The Sino-British joint declaration made in
1984 as well as our future constitution, the Basic Law, promised a high degree of
autonomy for the future Hong Kong government."
Martin_lee says, "This clearly includes the education system
and all education as well as education promises."
Martin_lee says, "The fact that some people may think that
general standard of English among our students is not sufficiently good does not
mean or justify any intervention from Beijing. Our people are aiming at
bilingualism. Done."
Moderator presents question #161 from Harv1: Mr. Lee is Taiwan
playing any role direct or indirect in attempting to play an influence in HK's
upcoming government?
Martin_lee says, "China clearly wants to win Taiwan back to
the fold but, Taiwan people are clearly watching Hong Kong very closely."
Martin_lee says, "If China mishandles Hong Kong, then the
people in Taiwan will resist reunification. So the Taiwan factor is always
thought to be a very important one in China's policies towards Hong Kong."
Martin_lee says, "But, no factor is more important than the
Chinese leaders' ability to stay in power. And if they feel their position is
jeopardized, they would stop at nothing."
Martin_lee says, "The Beijing massacre in 1989 illustrates
this point very well. Before the June 4 massacre in 1989, China's economy was
doing extremely well. But the Chinese leaders thought the student movement was
threatening their ability to govern, and so they brought in the army and the
tanks to shoot and kill their own people, with the result that China's economy
was completely ruined for three long years. I am therefore afraid that China"
Martin_lee says, "I am therefore afraid that China might
sacrifice Taiwan or Hong Kong if the Chinese leaders believe it was necessary to
do so in order to remain in power."
Moderator says, "Thank you Mr. Lee, Let's follow up now with
TIME bureau Chief Sandra Burton."
Moderator presents question #158 from Harv1: Sandra, from your
perspective, what preparations are various sectors of the population making in
lieu of the pending transition?
Moderator says, "In light of, Sandra."
Sandra_burton says, "People in Hong Kong are relatively
calm, if anxious about the future, but so far the polls show a good degree of
confidence in the future, and there have been no runs on the banks or mass exodus
of people."
Moderator presents question #163 from Harv1: Ms. Burton - how is
HK's financial community reacting?
Moderator says, "Things seem to be OK for Capital, is this
true?"
Sandra_burton says, "It is riding high at the moment.
Investment is pouring into the Hong Kong stock exchange from Chinese companies,
the property market is soaring, and there has been no recent evidence of capital
flight of foreign money."
Moderator says, "It seems as if there's not neccessarily a
correlation with capitalism and democracy. Hong Kong was great for capitalism
before it was great for civil rights, do you agree?"
Sandra_burton says, "That is true. However, the Hong Kong
financial markets have thrived under the stable political climate and the rule of
common law which Britain provided."
Sandra_burton says, " So the level playing field,
transparency of financial transactions, the free flow of information, and many
other factors which Britain endowed Hong Kong must remain if the economy is to
thrive in the future."
Moderator presents question #143 from Anivil: Ms. Burton, the Chinese
do not have a free, press, do you think they will attempt to place restrictions
on Hong Kong's press, and how will that effect your job?
Sandra_burton says, "The Chinese may try to intimidate the
press, but it will be up to the hong Kong government to take action against the
press or to tolerate it."
Sandra_burton says, "I have confidence at this point that
the government will try to be tolerant and that cases against the press will be
taken to the courts. Some legal procedures will be necessary before the press can
be silenced."
Sandra_burton says, "Meanwhile, I would expect that we
journalists and our readers in Hong Kong and the international community would
create a certain uproar if action was taken against us. So I think we will be
able to continue to write freely under the protection of these various forces."
Moderator says, "What do you think will happen to Martin Lee
and his party?"
Sandra_burton says, "The Democratic Party has said that it
would participate in the 1998 elections for a new legislature. Meanwhile, they
have agreed to dialogue regularly with the incoming Chief Executive Mr. Tung."
Sandra_burton says, " I'm sure they will also continue to
mount demonstrations and otherwise communicate their views on government policy
to the public."
Sandra_burton says, "I think they will survive therefore
until the elections, and they will probably get a lot of votes. Although, as
Martin Lee said, the electoral rules will be stacked against them."
Moderator presents question #167 from Marcusbales: Ms Burton: I
understand more Chinese troops have arrived than were promised; what is the
status of troops stationed there now -- where are they and how many are there?
Sandra_burton says, "Two groups of troops have arrived, but
that is not more than was promised. The British and the Chinese have agreed on
the troop movements. Those that have come in early are unarmed, and they are
maintaining a very low profile inside the garrison which the British are
leaving."
Sandra_burton says, " We're told that the British commander
and the Chinese commander on getting on well together."
Moderator presents question #169 from Helba: One UK politician said
China doesn't mind elections, so long as they know the results beforehand. How
can the Democratic Party ever be allowed a voice in HK politics?
Sandra_burton says, "It will have a voice in Hong Kong
politics, because it reflects the aspirations of a great number of Hong Kong
people. However, it will not be a majority party."
Moderator presents question #170 from Jenifermattos: Sandy, why isn't
the media covering these electoral rules better than they are? Isn't this
basically a case in which Beijing is purposely changing the rules to ensure the
death of the Democratic party?
Sandra_burton says, "I think some of the pro-Beijing forces
on the committee that has proposed the electoral rules are trying to kill the
Democratic Party."
Sandra_burton says, " But I don't think that the incoming
government of Hong Kong, which is, after all, comprised of Hong Kong people, not
mainland officials, is trying to do that. They would like to marginalize the
party, but they know it would be unwise to try and shut out a party as popular as
the Democrats."
Moderator says, "Sandy, Hong Kong journalist Frances
Moriariti told us that, in fact, corruption was the number one concern for most
Hong Kong residents. Has the threat to human rights been exaggerated?"
Sandra_burton says, "The threat to human rights is
important, and I think it is good that the Hong Kong community and the
international community reacted so strongly to threats to the civil liberties.
But in fairness, we have to remind our readers that Britain ruled for nearly 150
years with limited civil liberties in terms of protest demonstrations."
Moderator presents question #171 from Fortune_sysop: Sandra, Honk
Kong is becoming less competitive than countries like, say, Singapore -- it's
salaries and office rents are too high. If Hong kong does not continue
prospering, will Beijing allow it to keep its special status? Like, why bother if
it does?
Sandra_burton says, "The incoming government considers the
threat of rising costs and increasing competition from the likes of Singapore as
its biggest challenge: bigger than the political challenges which we focus on so
intensely."
Sandra_burton says, "The economic challenges are the ones
they will be trying to address first."
Moderator presents question #172 from Fortune_sysop: Sandra, I read a
recent article which said that the big multinationals are pulling out, not
because of worries about Beijing, but because the expenses are too high and the
quality of the work force is falling. is that your impression?
Sandra_burton says, "No, I haven't heard of any major
multinationals pulling out yet. The only company so noted is Reuters, which
recently moved its operations to Singapore for a variety of reasons, including
costs."
Sandra_burton says, " But I'm not aware of others."
Moderator says, "Sandra Burton, thanks very much for joining
us. And thanks to everyone and we're sorry about the tech problems to night. I
promise to remedy them. Good night."