There are limits, of course, to how many lives you can give a
pile of debris. In the long run, we have to reduce the amount of
material we use in the first place. Some progress is being
made--aluminum cans and plastic soda bottles have become thinner
over the years, for example--but more sweeping reductions will
require a whole new kind of manufacturing process.
That, says Lifset, is where nanotechnology plays a role. In this
emerging field, which employs just about every kind of scientific
and engineering discipline, researchers expect to create products
by building them from scratch, atom by atom, molecule by
molecule. This bottom-up nanotechnological way of making things
differs from the traditional drilling, sawing, etching, milling
and other fabrication methods that create so much waste along the
way.
Researchers have made headway toward molecule-size transistors
and wires and even batteries thousands of times as small as the
period at the end of this sentence. These laboratory feats make
talk of sugar cube-size computers less speculative than it was a
few years ago. Says Lifset: "A lot of the consumer goods and
industrial equipment could become dramatically smaller when
nanotechnology comes online. That, plus more efficient recovery
of the discarded goods, ought to translate into huge reductions
in waste."
But technology is not enough. Just as critical are changes in
attitudes and lifestyles. Brad Allenby, AT&T's vice president for
environment, safety and health, believes our move from the
industrial age to the information age could help enormously. At
last count, he says, 29% of AT&T's management force telecommuted,
meaning less reliance on cars. This, Allenby speculates, could be
part of something bigger--a shift in our view of what enhances our
quality of life. Maybe we'll put less value on things that use
lots of materials--like three cars in the family driveway--and more
on things that don't swallow up resources--like telecommuting and
surfing the Internet. Maybe downloading collections of music from
the Web will reduce the demand for CD cases. And while visions of
a "paperless office" have proved wildly wrong so far, we still
have an opportunity to use computers to cut consumption of paper
and the trees it comes from.
Allenby thinks of such trends as "dematerialization." The deeper
dematerialization goes in society, the less stuff there will be
to discard. What's more, as society becomes more
information-rich, the easier it will be to find uses for the
diminishing amount of discarded materials. Maybe, with the help
of brokering services on the Internet, we can generalize the
principle that governs garage sales: One person's garbage is
another's treasure. When that attitude goes global, the human
beings of the third millennium may be able to look back on their
former garbage-producing ways as a forgivable error of their
youth as a species.
Ivan Amato, a free-lance magazine and radio reporter, is the
author of Stuff: The Materials the World Is Made Of.
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3