[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
  • v21 home
  • live events
  • bulletin boards
  • caleb carr mystery

At the lower end of this predicted warming range, the temperature rise would take us back to the conditions that existed between A.D. 950 and 1350, when the climate was 1°C (2°F) warmer than it is now. This time period is regarded as one of the most benign weather regimes in history. To find temperature swings at the upper end, you have to go back 10,000 years, to when the earth was exiting the last Ice Age. Temperatures during the Ice Age were 5°C (10°F) cooler than they are now, and there was a series of incidents during which global temperatures changed as much as 10°F in a matter of decades. If that were to happen now, expanding oceans might flood coastlines and generate fiercer storms. And as weather patterns changed, some places could get wetter and some dryer, and the ranges of diseases could expand. Civilization has seen--and endured--such changes in the past, but they may come much more swiftly this time, making it harder to withstand the jolts.

The main reason for the spread in the IPCC predictions is uncertainty about how much carbon dioxide will be added to the atmosphere by human activity, because how we will respond to the threat of climate warming is the greatest imponderable of all. We can probably develop technologies to deal with excess carbon--some scientists talk about removing it from smokestacks and stashing it underground--but the most direct way to control carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is not to put it there in the first place. This is the point of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol--signed by 84 nations but not ratified by the U.S. Senate--which would limit developed countries' carbon emissions from cars, power plants and other major users of fossil fuels.

It makes no sense to overreact to the prospect of global warming, but it makes no sense to ignore it either. A prudent policy that stresses conservation and alternate energy sources seems to me to be wise insurance in an uncertain age. After all, our grandchildren will thank us for developing high-mileage cars, energy-efficient appliances and cheap solar energy, no matter how the future of global warming plays out.

James Trefil is a George Mason University physics professor and author of 101 Things You Don't Know About Science and No One Else Does Either.



PAGE 1 | 2 | 3





SIDEBAR: ...And Then How Cold?

Back to Question Page

What Would a Green Future Look Like?

How Hot Will It Get?

Got Any Good Drugs?

What Will Happen to Alternative Medicine?

Will Christopher Reeve Walk Again?

Can I Grow a New Brain?

Will There Be Any Wilderness Left?

Will We Still Eat Meat?

Can I Replace My Body?

What New Things Are Going to Kill Me?

Can We Make Garbage Disappear?

What Will Be the Catch of the Day?

Can I Live to be 125?

Will We Keep Getting Fatter?

Will We Still Need to Have Sex?

When Will We Cure Cancer?

Will Robots Make House Calls?

Will We Run Out of Gas?

Will Malthus Be Right?